[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxE2seZNaPNFapZO@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:09:21 +0000
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Greg Marsden <greg.marsden@...cle.com>,
Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 03/57] mm/memcontrol: Fix seq_buf size to save
memory when PAGE_SIZE is large
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:58:10AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> Previously the seq_buf used for accumulating the memory.stat output was
> sized at PAGE_SIZE. But the amount of output is invariant to PAGE_SIZE;
> If 4K is enough on a 4K page system, then it should also be enough on a
> 64K page system, so we can save 60K om the static buffer used in
> mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(). Let's make it so.
>
> This also has the beneficial side effect of removing a place in the code
> that assumed PAGE_SIZE is a compile-time constant. So this helps our
> quest towards supporting boot-time page size selection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists