| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202410180024.2NpHo5Z6-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:56:48 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, upstream@...oha.com
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: airoha: Add EN7581 Cpufreq SMC driver
Hi Christian,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241017]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Marangi/cpufreq-airoha-Add-EN7581-Cpufreq-SMC-driver/20241017-001217
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241016161044.28745-1-ansuelsmth%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: airoha: Add EN7581 Cpufreq SMC driver
config: arm-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241018/202410180024.2NpHo5Z6-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241018/202410180024.2NpHo5Z6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410180024.2NpHo5Z6-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:27:34: error: variable has incomplete type 'const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:27:15: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:31:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:27:15: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
^
>> drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:33:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'arm_smccc_1_2_smc' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&args, &res);
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:40:34: error: variable has incomplete type 'const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:40:15: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:45:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:40:15: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:47:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'arm_smccc_1_2_smc' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&args, &res);
^
drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:68:17: warning: variable 'cpu_dev' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
struct device *cpu_dev;
^
>> drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:103:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'kzalloc' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
^
>> drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:103:7: warning: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct airoha_cpufreq_priv *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:145:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'kfree' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
kfree(priv);
^
2 warnings and 8 errors generated.
vim +/arm_smccc_1_2_smc +33 drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c
24
25 static unsigned int airoha_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
26 {
27 const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
28 .a0 = AIROHA_SIP_AVS_HANDLE,
29 .a1 = AIROHA_AVS_OP_GET_FREQ,
30 };
31 struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
32
> 33 arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&args, &res);
34
35 return (int)(res.a0 * 1000);
36 }
37
38 static int airoha_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
39 {
40 const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
41 .a0 = AIROHA_SIP_AVS_HANDLE,
42 .a1 = AIROHA_AVS_OP_FREQ_DYN_ADJ,
43 .a3 = index,
44 };
45 struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
46
47 arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&args, &res);
48
49 /* SMC signal correct apply by unsetting BIT 0 */
50 return res.a0 & BIT(0) ? -EINVAL : 0;
51 }
52
53 static struct airoha_cpufreq_priv *airoha_cpufreq_find_data(int cpu)
54 {
55 struct airoha_cpufreq_priv *priv;
56
57 list_for_each_entry(priv, &priv_list, list) {
58 if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, priv->cpus))
59 return priv;
60 }
61
62 return NULL;
63 }
64
65 static int airoha_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
66 {
67 struct airoha_cpufreq_priv *priv;
68 struct device *cpu_dev;
69
70 priv = airoha_cpufreq_find_data(policy->cpu);
71 if (!priv)
72 return -ENODEV;
73
74 cpu_dev = priv->cpu_dev;
75 cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, priv->cpus);
76 policy->driver_data = priv;
77 policy->freq_table = priv->freq_table;
78
79 return 0;
80 }
81
82 static struct cpufreq_driver airoha_cpufreq_driver = {
83 .flags = CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
84 CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV,
85 .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
86 .target_index = airoha_cpufreq_set_target,
87 .get = airoha_cpufreq_get,
88 .init = airoha_cpufreq_init,
89 .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
90 .name = "airoha-cpufreq",
91 };
92
93 static int airoha_cpufreq_driver_init_cpu(int cpu)
94 {
95 struct airoha_cpufreq_priv *priv;
96 struct device *cpu_dev;
97 int ret;
98
99 cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
100 if (!cpu_dev)
101 return -EPROBE_DEFER;
102
> 103 priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
104 if (!priv)
105 return -ENOMEM;
106
107 if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&priv->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
108 return -ENOMEM;
109
110 cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, priv->cpus);
111 priv->cpu_dev = cpu_dev;
112
113 ret = dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, priv->cpus);
114 if (ret)
115 goto err;
116
117 ret = dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(priv->cpus);
118 if (ret)
119 goto err;
120
121 ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &priv->freq_table);
122 if (ret)
123 goto err;
124
125 list_add(&priv->list, &priv_list);
126
127 return 0;
128
129 err:
130 dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
131 free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
132
133 return ret;
134 }
135
136 static void airoha_cpufreq_release(void)
137 {
138 struct airoha_cpufreq_priv *priv, *tmp;
139
140 list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, tmp, &priv_list, list) {
141 dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &priv->freq_table);
142 dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
143 free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
144 list_del(&priv->list);
> 145 kfree(priv);
146 }
147 }
148
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists