linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/14] clk: qcom: rpmh: add support for SAR2130P

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a2f6308c-9eb8-4608-bd5a-a5deaf9a987a@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:11:08 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] clk: qcom: rpmh: add support for SAR2130P

On 17.10.2024 6:57 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Define clocks as supported by the RPMh on the SAR2130P platform. It
> seems that on this platform RPMh models only CXO clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index 4acde937114af3d7fdc15f3d125a72d42d0fde21..8cb15430d0171a8ed6b05e51d1901af63a4564c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -389,6 +389,16 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(ipa, "IP0");
>  DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(pka, "PKA0");
>  DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(qpic_clk, "QP0");
>  
> +static struct clk_hw *sar2130p_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1_ao.hw,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sar2130p = {
> +	.clks = sar2130p_rpmh_clocks,
> +	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sar2130p_rpmh_clocks),
> +};

This is identical to the QDU1000 setup. Perhaps you can rename it to
something generic (bi_tcxo_div1_clocks[]) and reference it in both
compatible strings (as the compatibility seems rather incidental)

Konrad