[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d69ae60d-c4ec-4c79-8131-b4abebc7fef1@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:02:32 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, hanchunchao@...pur.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] soc: qcom: socinfo: fix revision check in
qcom_socinfo_probe()
On 16.10.2024 4:48 PM, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> In success case, the revision holds a non-null pointer. The current
> logic incorrectly returns an error for a non-null pointer, whereas
> it should return an error for a null pointer.
>
> The socinfo driver for IPQ9574 and IPQ5332 is currently broken,
> resulting in the following error message
> qcom-socinfo qcom-socinfo: probe with driver qcom-socinfo failed with
> error -12
>
> Add a null check for the revision to ensure it returns an error only in
> failure case (null pointer).
>
> Fixes: e694d2b5c58b ("soc: qcom: Add check devm_kasprintf() returned value")
> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists