[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6acaeefe-54f1-4a7f-9e07-bc8b1bfbab08@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 02:23:59 +0300
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Krzysztof WilczyĆski
<kw@...ux.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: Provide devm_clk_bulk_get_all_enabled()
helper
On 10/17/24 10:45 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Cristian Ciocaltea (2024-09-26 03:43:20)
>> Commit 265b07df758a ("clk: Provide managed helper to get and enable bulk
>> clocks") added devm_clk_bulk_get_all_enable() function, but missed to
>> return the number of clocks stored in the clk_bulk_data table referenced
>> by the clks argument. Without knowing the number, it's not possible to
>> iterate these clocks when needed, hence the argument is useless and
>> could have been simply removed.
>>
>> Introduce devm_clk_bulk_get_all_enabled() variant, which is consistent
>> with devm_clk_bulk_get_all() in terms of the returned value:
>>
>> > 0 if one or more clocks have been stored
>> = 0 if there are no clocks
>> < 0 if an error occurred
>>
>> Moreover, the naming is consistent with devm_clk_get_enabled(), i.e. use
>> the past form of 'enable'.
[...]
> Instead of duplicating can you make devm_clk_bulk_get_all_enable() use
> the devm_clk_bulk_get_all_enabled() function but not return the number
> of clks all in this patch? It will make the diff much more readable that
> way.
Done in v3 [1].
Thanks for reviewing,
Cristian
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241018-clk_bulk_ena_fix-v3-0-57e8bb82460c@collabora.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists