[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87jze76y4r.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 14:29:08 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@....com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Dave Jiang
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Jonathan Cameron
<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, "Ben Cheatham"
<benjamin.cheatham@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cxl: Avoid to create dax regions for type2
accelerators
Hi, Alejandro,
Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@....com> writes:
> I did comment on this some time ago and I'm doing it again.
>
>
> This is originally part of the type2 patchset, and I'm keeping it in
> V4. I do not understand why you pick code changes (you explicitly said
> that in the first RFC) from there and use it here, and without
> previous discussion about this necessity in the list. I do not think
> this is usual, at least in other kernel subsystems I'm more familiar
> with, so I will raise this in today's cxl open source collaboration
> sync.
No. I picked this change from Dan's series as follows,
https://eclists.intel.com/sympa//arc/linux-bkc/2024-10/msg00018.html
So, I added co-developed-by and signed-off-by of Dan.
IIUC, your picked this change from Dan's series too?
Feel free to include this change in your series. If your patchset is
merged firstly, I will rebase on yours and drop this change.
[snip]
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists