linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add open coded version of kmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241017080604.541872-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 01:06:03 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add open coded version of kmem_cache iterator

Add a new open coded iterator for kmem_cache which can be called from a
BPF program like below.  It doesn't take any argument and traverses all
kmem_cache entries.

  struct kmem_cache *pos;

  bpf_for_each(kmem_cache, pos) {
      ...
  }

As it needs to grab slab_mutex, it should be called from sleepable BPF
programs only.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c         |  3 ++
 kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 073e6f04f4d765ff..d1dfa4f335577914 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -3111,6 +3111,9 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_bits_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_bits_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_copy_from_user_str, KF_SLEEPABLE)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_get_kmem_cache)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_kmem_cache_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_kmem_cache_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL | KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY | KF_SLEEPABLE)
 BTF_KFUNCS_END(common_btf_ids)
 
 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set common_kfunc_set = {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c
index ebc101d7da51b57c..31ddaf452b20a458 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/kmem_cache_iter.c
@@ -145,6 +145,93 @@ static const struct bpf_iter_seq_info kmem_cache_iter_seq_info = {
 	.seq_ops		= &kmem_cache_iter_seq_ops,
 };
 
+/* open-coded version */
+struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache {
+	__u64 __opaque[1];
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern {
+	struct kmem_cache *pos;
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_kmem_cache_new(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*kit) > sizeof(*it));
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(*kit) != __alignof__(*it));
+
+	kit->pos = NULL;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc struct kmem_cache *bpf_iter_kmem_cache_next(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+	struct kmem_cache *prev = kit->pos;
+	struct kmem_cache *next;
+	bool destroy = false;
+
+	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
+
+	if (list_empty(&slab_caches)) {
+		mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (prev == NULL)
+		next = list_first_entry(&slab_caches, struct kmem_cache, list);
+	else if (list_last_entry(&slab_caches, struct kmem_cache, list) == prev)
+		next = NULL;
+	else
+		next = list_next_entry(prev, list);
+
+	/* boot_caches have negative refcount, don't touch them */
+	if (next && next->refcount > 0)
+		next->refcount++;
+
+	/* Skip kmem_cache_destroy() for active entries */
+	if (prev && prev->refcount > 1)
+		prev->refcount--;
+	else if (prev && prev->refcount == 1)
+		destroy = true;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
+
+	if (destroy)
+		kmem_cache_destroy(prev);
+
+	kit->pos = next;
+	return next;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+	struct kmem_cache *s = kit->pos;
+	bool destroy = false;
+
+	if (s == NULL)
+		return;
+
+	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
+
+	/* Skip kmem_cache_destroy() for active entries */
+	if (s->refcount > 1)
+		s->refcount--;
+	else if (s->refcount == 1)
+		destroy = true;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
+
+	if (destroy)
+		kmem_cache_destroy(s);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
+
 static void bpf_iter_kmem_cache_show_fdinfo(const struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux,
 					    struct seq_file *seq)
 {
-- 
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog