lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e221493ff4a456cbdd1b773c670d1c7@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 09:39:58 +0000
From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
CC: "dave.jiang@...el.com" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, "dan.j.williams@...el.com"
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
	"vishal.l.verma@...el.com" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "ira.weiny@...el.com"
	<ira.weiny@...el.com>, "dave@...olabs.net" <dave@...olabs.net>,
	"linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linuxarm
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>, tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>, "Zengtao (B)"
	<prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
>Sent: 16 October 2024 22:01
>To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
>Cc: dave.jiang@...el.com; dan.j.williams@...el.com; Jonathan Cameron
><jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>; vishal.l.verma@...el.com;
>ira.weiny@...el.com; dave@...olabs.net; linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>; tanxiaofei
><tanxiaofei@...wei.com>; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records
>
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 05:33:45PM +0100, shiju.jose@...wei.com wrote:
>> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
>>
>> CXL spec rev 3.1 CXL Event Records has updated w.r.t CXL spec rev 3.0.
>> Add updates for the above spec changes in the CXL events records and
>> CXL trace events implementation.
>>
>> Note: Please apply following fix patch first if not present.
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/cxl/patch/20241014143003.1170-1-s
>> hiju.jose@...wei.com/
>>
>> Shiju Jose (4):
>>   cxl/events: Updates for CXL Common Event Record Format
>>   cxl/events: Updates for CXL General Media Event Record
>>   cxl/events: Updates for CXL DRAM Event Record
>>   cxl/events: Updates for CXL Memory Module Event Record
>
>Thanks, this looks useful! I didn't review line by line but do have some feedback
>before for a v1:
Hi Alison,
Thanks for the feedbacks.

>
>- Suggest being more explicit in the commit msg(s). Something like:
>cxl/events: Update Common Event Record to CXL spec 3.1
Sure. Will add.

>
>- I was a bit surprised that this doesn't simply append new fields to the
>TP_printk() output. Is there some reason for that?
Will do. Thought print new fields before region_name and region_uuid. 

>
>- How about updating the mock of these events to include these new fields. I
>don't think this introduces any new formats, but I would certainly eyeball all 3:
>dmesg tp_printk, trace file, and monitor output because all 3 (sadly) present a
>bit differently.
>
I will update the CXL mock test for these new fields.
 
>-- Alison
>
>>
>>  drivers/cxl/core/trace.h | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  include/cxl/event.h      |  20 +++-
>>  2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
Thanks,
Shiju

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ