[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241017144438.257aaa76@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 14:44:38 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Philipp Zabel
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, kernel@...labora.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/panfrost: Replace DRM driver allocation method
with newer one
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:31:36 +0100
Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com> wrote:
> Drop the deprecated DRM driver allocation method in favour of
> devm_drm_dev_alloc(). Overall just make it the same as in Panthor.
> Also discard now superfluous generic and platform device pointers inside
> the main panfrost device structure.
>
> Some ancient checkpatch issues unearthed as a result of these changes
> were also fixed, like lines too long or double assignment in one line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
I didn't do a thorough review of the diff, but I'm assuming it's
correct if the driver compiles.
BTW, I don't see it done in this series, but it might be good to also
turn devm_ calls into drmm_ ones, and dev_<loglevel> into
drm_<loglevel>.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists