[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxEV6ocpKLjPC8H4@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 06:49:30 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Yonatan Maman <ymaman@...dia.com>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, herbst@...hat.com, lyude@...hat.com,
dakr@...hat.com, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
leon@...nel.org, jglisse@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, apopple@...dia.com,
bskeggs@...dia.com, Gal Shalom <GalShalom@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm/hmm: HMM API for P2P DMA to device zone pages
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:46:44AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 06:12:55AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:05:39AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Broadly I think whatever flow NVMe uses for P2P will apply to ODP as
> > > well.
> >
> > ODP is a lot simpler than NVMe for P2P actually :(
>
> What is your thinking there? I'm looking at the latest patches and I
> would expect dma_iova_init() to accept a phys so it can call
> pci_p2pdma_map_type() once for the whole transaction. It is a slow
> operation.
You can't do it for the whole transaction. Here is my suggestion
for ODP:
http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/hch/misc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/dma-split-wip
For NVMe I need to figure out a way to split bios on a per P2P
type boundary as we don't have any space to record if something is a bus
mapped address.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists