[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241018134129.2058068-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:32:34 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/4] gpio: xgene-sb: Drop ACPI_PTR() and CONFIG_ACPI guards
The complexity of config guards needed for ACPI_PTR() is not worthwhile
for the small amount of saved data. This example was doing it correctly
but I am proposing dropping this so as to reduce chance of cut and paste
where it is done wrong.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
index 69faf9b8d460..0ebe3b215634 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
@@ -311,20 +311,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id xgene_gpio_sb_of_match[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xgene_gpio_sb_of_match);
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
static const struct acpi_device_id xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match[] = {
{"APMC0D15", 0},
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match);
-#endif
static struct platform_driver xgene_gpio_sb_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "xgene-gpio-sb",
.of_match_table = xgene_gpio_sb_of_match,
- .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match),
- },
+ .acpi_match_table = xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match,
+ },
.probe = xgene_gpio_sb_probe,
.remove = xgene_gpio_sb_remove,
};
--
2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac
Powered by blists - more mailing lists