linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Introduce more transport properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZxJsSggCLCCoaC2m@pluto>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:10:18 +0100
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
	james.quinlan@...adcom.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, etienne.carriere@...com,
	peng.fan@....nxp.com, michal.simek@....com, quic_sibis@...cinc.com,
	quic_nkela@...cinc.com, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Introduce more
 transport properties

On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 08:33:40AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 09:06:00AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Depending on specific hardware and firmware design choices, it may be
> > possible for different platforms to end up having different requirements
> > regarding the same transport characteristics.
> > 

Hi Rob,

thanks for having a look.

> > Introduce max-msg-size and max-msg properties to describe such platform
> > specific transport constraints, since they cannot be discovered otherwise.
> > 
> > Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > index 54d7d11bfed4..42852ed887f2 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > @@ -131,6 +131,22 @@ properties:
> >        be a non-zero value if set.
> >      minimum: 1
> >  
> > +  max-msg-size:
> 
> Vendor prefix needed.

Ok, but these are common properties like max-rx-timeout-ms and others in this
bindings so I did not expect to have to explicit set a vendor...well I
really dont know what's the rule here, so I went for similarity.

> 
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +    description:
> > +      An optional value, expressed in bytes, representing the maximum size
> > +      allowed for the payload of messages transmitted on this transport.
> > +      If set it is recommended to be greater or equal than the minimum size
> > +      required to support all the messages defined by the set of protocols
> > +      implemented on this platform.
> 
> Sounds kind of broken if less than the minimum...
> 

Well, absolutely but the minimum payload really depends on how many
protocols the SCMI server in firmware supports on this platform...the
set of implemented messages (some are optional) AND the spec version
number...so I cannot state really a fixed safe minimum here...it was
just a polite warning for the user not to shot himself in the foot...
..but whoever missteps over this will see a lot of comms errors
indeed...I will drop the warning in V2

> > +
> > +  max-msg:
> 
> Vendor prefix and could be a bit more specific what this is.

Ok I will explain more in v2.

Thanks,
Cristian