[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c81a6cc-2466-4932-805b-056d4e7dec2b@csgroup.eu>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:40:14 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pavithra Prakash <pavrampu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Disha Goel <disgoel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] powerpc: mm/fault: Fix kfence page fault
reporting
Le 18/10/2024 à 19:29, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) a écrit :
> copy_from_kernel_nofault() can be called when doing read of /proc/kcore.
> /proc/kcore can have some unmapped kfence objects which when read via
> copy_from_kernel_nofault() can cause page faults. Since *_nofault()
> functions define their own fixup table for handling fault, use that
> instead of asking kfence to handle such faults.
>
> Hence we search the exception tables for the nip which generated the
> fault. If there is an entry then we let the fixup table handler handle the
> page fault by returning an error from within ___do_page_fault().
>
> This can be easily triggered if someone tries to do dd from /proc/kcore.
> dd if=/proc/kcore of=/dev/null bs=1M
>
> <some example false negatives>
> ===============================
> BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in copy_from_kernel_nofault+0xb0/0x1c8
> Invalid read at 0x000000004f749d2e:
> copy_from_kernel_nofault+0xb0/0x1c8
> 0xc0000000057f7950
> read_kcore_iter+0x41c/0x9ac
> proc_reg_read_iter+0xe4/0x16c
> vfs_read+0x2e4/0x3b0
> ksys_read+0x88/0x154
> system_call_exception+0x124/0x340
> system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
>
> BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in copy_from_kernel_nofault+0xb0/0x1c8
> Use-after-free read at 0x000000008fbb08ad (in kfence-#0):
> copy_from_kernel_nofault+0xb0/0x1c8
> 0xc0000000057f7950
> read_kcore_iter+0x41c/0x9ac
> proc_reg_read_iter+0xe4/0x16c
> vfs_read+0x2e4/0x3b0
> ksys_read+0x88/0x154
> system_call_exception+0x124/0x340
> system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
>
> Fixes: 90cbac0e995d ("powerpc: Enable KFENCE for PPC32")
> Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Nit below.
> Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> index 81c77ddce2e3..316f5162ffc4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> @@ -439,10 +439,17 @@ static int ___do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
> /*
> * The kernel should never take an execute fault nor should it
> * take a page fault to a kernel address or a page fault to a user
> - * address outside of dedicated places
> + * address outside of dedicated places.
> + *
> + * Rather than kfence directly reporting false negatives, search whether
> + * the NIP belongs to the fixup table for cases where fault could come
> + * from functions like copy_from_kernel_nofault().
> */
> if (unlikely(!is_user && bad_kernel_fault(regs, error_code, address, is_write))) {
> - if (kfence_handle_page_fault(address, is_write, regs))
> +
Why do you need a blank line here ?
> + if (is_kfence_address((void *)address) &&
> + !search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs)) &&
> + kfence_handle_page_fault(address, is_write, regs))
> return 0;
>
> return SIGSEGV;
> --
> 2.46.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists