lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241018191128.50502c4e@jic23-huawei>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:11:28 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Julien Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sá
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] ad7380: add adaq4370-4 and adaq4380-4 support

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:25:53 +0200
Julien Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com> wrote:

> Le mar. 15 oct. 2024 à 18:43, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> a écrit :
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 11:09:05AM +0200, Julien Stephan wrote:  
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This series add support for adaq4370-4 (2MSPS) and adaq4380-4 (4MSPS)
> > > which are quad-channel precision data acquisition signal chain μModule
> > > solutions compatible with the ad738x family, with the following differences:
> > >
> > > - configurable gain in front of each 4 adc
> > > - internal reference is 3V derived from refin-supply (5V)
> > > - additional supplies
> > >
> > > This series depends on [1] which fix several supplies issues
> > >
> > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241007-ad7380-fix-supplies-v1-0-badcf813c9b9@baylibre.com/  
> >
> > What exactly makes this series RFC rather than v1?  
> 
> Hi Conor,
> I am sorry I forgot to add some context here... There is an ongoing
> discussion on the dependent series about power supplies and Jonathan
> asked me to send this series to see how to properly handle the supply
> fix...
> See  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014193701.40e3785a@jic23-huawei/

Thanks,

It did the job for that.  Given it's on list, do you want a review
of the rest of the patch set, or is it still enough of a work in progress
that we should hold off?

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Cheers,
> Julien
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ