[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxGtFCzk5kwycFV3@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:34:28 +0800
From: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>, Jeff Xu
<jeffxu@...omium.org>, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>, Kees Cook
<kees@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, Matthew Wilcox
<willy@...radead.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Paul Moore
<paul@...l-moore.com>, Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>, "Suren
Baghdasaryan" <surenb@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<ying.huang@...el.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>, <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
<oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm] cacded5e42: aim9.brk_test.ops_per_sec
-5.0% regression
hi, Lorenzo,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:54:13AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:58:38AM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
[...]
>
> Thanks for this. As far as I'm concerned this puts us into noise territory,
> so we'll go with this as the solution!
>
> A side-note, the brk2 test from the will-it-scale suite, written explicitly
> to be more real-world representative, sees an actual performance
> _improvement_ here (though small).
>
> So overall I'm comfortable with this, we can revisit if anybody raises any
> objection! The benefit in de-duplicating code is very significant.
thanks a lot for all these informations!
>
> Thanks for all your help, hugely appreciated!
you are welcome :) just our great pleasure!
>
> Cheers, Lorenzo
>
> [snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists