[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <075d1720-2c2a-4be4-b5b1-45ef9c309096@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 12:20:17 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mce/genpool: Make mce_gen_pool_create()
return explicit error codes
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c
> index 4284749ec803..ffa28769dea6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c
> @@ -120,20 +120,20 @@ static int mce_gen_pool_create(void)
> {
> int mce_numrecords, mce_poolsz, order;
> struct gen_pool *gpool;
> - int ret = -ENOMEM;
> void *mce_pool;
> + int ret;
>
Nit: Maybe move the uninitialized ret along with the other ints in the
first line?
I had suggested something very similar but Boris felt that the current
code as-is reads better. But that was in a slightly different context.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240307170901.GBZen0re6AvpscLaTM@fat_crate.local/
> order = order_base_2(sizeof(struct mce_evt_llist));
> gpool = gen_pool_create(order, -1);
> if (!gpool)
> - return ret;
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> mce_numrecords = max(MCE_MIN_ENTRIES, num_possible_cpus() * MCE_PER_CPU);
> mce_poolsz = mce_numrecords * (1 << order);
> mce_pool = kmalloc(mce_poolsz, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mce_pool) {
> gen_pool_destroy(gpool);
> - return ret;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
> ret = gen_pool_add(gpool, (unsigned long)mce_pool, mce_poolsz, -1);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int mce_gen_pool_create(void)
>
> mce_evt_pool = gpool;
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int mce_gen_pool_init(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists