[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxK7G3S0N42ejJMh@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:46:35 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, zswap: don't touch the XArray lock if there is no
entry to free
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 03:25:25AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> if (xa_empty(tree))
> return;
>
> - entry = xa_erase(tree, offset);
> - if (entry)
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + entry = xas_load(&xas);
> + if (entry) {
You should call xas_reset() here. And I'm not sure it's a great idea to
spin waiting for the xa lock while holding the RCU read lock? Probably
not awful but I could easily be wrong.
> + xas_lock(&xas);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(xas_reload(&xas) != entry);
> + xas_store(&xas, NULL);
> + xas_unlock(&xas);
> zswap_entry_free(entry);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> int zswap_swapon(int type, unsigned long nr_pages)
> --
> 2.47.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists