linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_micfil: Add a flag to distinguish with different volume control types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <172928704112.212383.3559380039082750889.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 22:30:41 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: shengjiu.wang@...il.com, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, festevam@...il.com, 
 nicoleotsuka@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, 
 alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_micfil: Add a flag to distinguish with
 different volume control types

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:15:07 +0900, Chancel Liu wrote:
> On i.MX8MM the register of volume control has positive and negative
> values. It is different from other platforms like i.MX8MP and i.MX93
> which only have positive values. Add a volume_sx flag to use SX_TLV
> volume control for this kind of platform. Use common TLV volume control
> for other platforms.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_micfil: Add a flag to distinguish with different volume control types
      commit: da95e891dd5d5de6c5ebc010bd028a2e028de093

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark