[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241018221644.3240898-1-pcc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:16:43 -0700
From: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf, arm64: Fix address emission with tag-based KASAN enabled
When BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is enabled, the address of a bpf_tramp_image
struct on the stack is passed during the size calculation pass and
an address on the heap is passed during code generation. This may
cause a heap buffer overflow if the heap address is tagged because
emit_a64_mov_i64() will emit longer code than it did during the size
calculation pass. The same problem could occur without tag-based
KASAN if one of the 16-bit words of the stack address happened to
be all-ones during the size calculation pass. Fix the problem by
assuming the worst case (4 instructions) when calculating the size
of the bpf_tramp_image address emission.
Fixes: 19d3c179a377 ("bpf, arm64: Fix trampoline for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG")
Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I1496f2bc24fba7a1d492e16e2b94cf43714f2d3c
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8bbd0b20136a8..5db82bfc9dc11 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2220,7 +2220,11 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(20), A64_SP, regs_off + 8), ctx);
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
- emit_a64_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
+ /* for the first pass, assume the worst case */
+ if (!ctx->image)
+ ctx->idx += 4;
+ else
+ emit_a64_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
emit_call((const u64)__bpf_tramp_enter, ctx);
}
@@ -2264,7 +2268,11 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
im->ip_epilogue = ctx->ro_image + ctx->idx;
- emit_a64_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
+ /* for the first pass, assume the worst case */
+ if (!ctx->image)
+ ctx->idx += 4;
+ else
+ emit_a64_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
emit_call((const u64)__bpf_tramp_exit, ctx);
}
--
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists