| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <172923526377.1442.10549503257985449589.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 07:07:43 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Juri Lelli" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, "Connor O'Brien" <connoro@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@....com>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock irq safe
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5ec58525a1f1bd6ca8ea778e9df55cd82bc02e11
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5ec58525a1f1bd6ca8ea778e9df55cd82bc02e11
Author: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:53:35 -07:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:52:40 +02:00
locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock irq safe
With the proxy-execution series, we traverse the task->mutex->task
blocked_on/owner chain in the scheduler core. We do this while holding
the rq::lock to keep the structures in place while taking and
releasing the alternating lock types.
Since the mutex::wait_lock is one of the locks we will take in this
way under the rq::lock in the scheduler core, we need to make sure
that its usage elsewhere is irq safe.
[rebase & fix {un,}lock_wait_lock helpers in ww_mutex.h]
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@....com>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Tested-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241009235352.1614323-3-jstultz@google.com
---
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 21 +++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 6c94da0..cd248d1 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
struct mutex_waiter waiter;
struct ww_mutex *ww;
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret;
if (!use_ww_ctx)
@@ -620,7 +621,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
return 0;
}
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
/*
* After waiting to acquire the wait_lock, try again.
*/
@@ -681,7 +682,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
goto err;
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
/* Make sure we do wakeups before calling schedule */
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
wake_q_init(&wake_q);
@@ -706,9 +707,9 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_MUTEX);
}
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
}
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
acquired:
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
@@ -734,7 +735,7 @@ skip_wait:
if (ww_ctx)
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
preempt_enable();
return 0;
@@ -744,7 +745,7 @@ err:
__mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
err_early_kill:
trace_contention_end(lock, ret);
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
@@ -915,6 +916,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
struct task_struct *next = NULL;
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
unsigned long owner;
+ unsigned long flags;
mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
@@ -941,7 +943,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
}
}
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
debug_mutex_unlock(lock);
if (!list_empty(&lock->wait_list)) {
/* get the first entry from the wait-list: */
@@ -959,7 +961,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
__mutex_handoff(lock, next);
preempt_disable();
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
preempt_enable();
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
index a54bd16..37f025a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
@@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ __ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct mutex *lock)
return atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & MUTEX_FLAG_WAITERS;
}
-static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock)
+static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long *flags)
{
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, *flags);
}
-static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock)
+static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long *flags)
{
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, *flags);
}
static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct mutex *lock)
@@ -144,14 +144,14 @@ __ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
return rt_mutex_has_waiters(&lock->rtmutex);
}
-static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned long *flags)
{
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock, *flags);
}
-static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned long *flags)
{
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock, *flags);
}
static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct rt_mutex *lock)
@@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ static __always_inline void
ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+ unsigned long flags;
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock, ctx);
@@ -408,10 +409,10 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
* Uh oh, we raced in fastpath, check if any of the waiters need to
* die or wound us.
*/
- lock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
+ lock_wait_lock(&lock->base, &flags);
__ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx, &wake_q);
preempt_disable();
- unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
+ unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base, &flags);
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
preempt_enable();
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists