[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJprVNOLO-CoorNhvKrrSD1bNKdFrzth5BL0GHXffPv62jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:11:30 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com, quic_suruchia@...cinc.com, quic_pavir@...cinc.com,
quic_linchen@...cinc.com, quic_leiwei@...cinc.com,
bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add CMN PLL node for IPQ9574 SoC
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 09:55, Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/18/2024 6:32 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:16:54PM +0800, Luo Jie wrote:
> >> The CMN PLL clock controller allows selection of an input
> >> clock rate from a defined set of input clock rates. It in-turn
> >> supplies fixed rate output clocks to the hardware blocks that
> >> provide ethernet functions such as PPE (Packet Process Engine)
> >> and connected switch or PHY, and to GCC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi | 6 +++++-
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
> >> index 91e104b0f865..77e1e42083f3 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
> >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> >> * IPQ9574 RDP board common device tree source
> >> *
> >> * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> - * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> */
> >>
> >> /dts-v1/;
> >> @@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ &usb3 {
> >> status = "okay";
> >> };
> >>
> >> +&cmn_pll_ref_clk {
> >> + clock-frequency = <48000000>;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> &xo_board_clk {
> >> clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> >> };
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> >> index 14c7b3a78442..93f66bb83c5a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> >> @@ -3,10 +3,11 @@
> >> * IPQ9574 SoC device tree source
> >> *
> >> * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> - * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> */
> >>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq-cmn-pll.h>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,ipq9574.h>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> >> @@ -19,6 +20,11 @@ / {
> >> #size-cells = <2>;
> >>
> >> clocks {
> >> + cmn_pll_ref_clk: cmn-pll-ref-clk {
> >> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + };
> >
> > Which block provides this clock? If it is provided by the external XO
> > then it should not be a part of the SoC dtsi.
>
> The on-chip WiFi block supplies this reference clock. So keeping it in
> the SoC DTSI is perhaps appropriate.
Then maybe it should be provided by the WiFi device node? At least you
should document your design decisions in the commit message.
Also, I don't think this node passes DT schema validation. Did you check it?
>
> >
> >> +
> >> sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
> >> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> @@ -243,6 +249,18 @@ mdio: mdio@...00 {
> >> status = "disabled";
> >> };
> >>
> >> + cmn_pll: clock-controller@...00 {
> >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-cmn-pll";
> >> + reg = <0x0009b000 0x800>;
> >> + clocks = <&cmn_pll_ref_clk>,
> >> + <&gcc GCC_CMN_12GPLL_AHB_CLK>,
> >> + <&gcc GCC_CMN_12GPLL_SYS_CLK>;
> >> + clock-names = "ref", "ahb", "sys";
> >> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> + assigned-clocks = <&cmn_pll CMN_PLL_CLK>;
> >> + assigned-clock-rates-u64 = /bits/ 64 <12000000000>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> qfprom: efuse@...00 {
> >> compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom";
> >> reg = <0x000a4000 0x5a1>;
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
> >
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists