[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v7xp91c6.fsf@draig.linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:01:29 +0100
From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ARM
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Catalin
Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@....com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>, Anders Roxell
<anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Qemu v9.0.2: Boot failed qemu-arm with Linux next-20241017 tag.
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> writes:
> The QEMU-ARMv7 boot has failed with the Linux next-20241017 tag.
> The boot log is incomplete, and no kernel crash was detected.
> However, the system did not proceed far enough to reach the login prompt.
>
> Please find the incomplete boot log links below for your reference.
> The Qemu version is 9.0.2.
> The arm devices TI beaglebone x15 boot pass.
>
> This is always reproducible.
> First seen on Linux next-20241017 tag.
> Good: next-20241016
> Bad: next-20241017
>
> qemu-armv7:
> boot:
> * clang-19-lkftconfig
> * gcc-13-lkftconfig
> * clang-nightly-lkftconfig
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Boot log:
> -------
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.12.0-rc3-next-20241017
> (tuxmake@...make) (arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 13.3.0-5) 13.3.0,
> GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.43.1) #1 SMP @1729156545
> [ 0.000000] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [414fc0f0] revision 0 (ARMv7), cr=10c5387d
> [ 0.000000] CPU: div instructions available: patching division code
> [ 0.000000] CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, PIPT instruction cache
> [ 0.000000] OF: fdt: Machine model: linux,dummy-virt
> [ 0.000000] random: crng init done
> [ 0.000000] earlycon: pl11 at MMIO 0x09000000 (options '')
> [ 0.000000] printk: legacy bootconsole [pl11] enabled
> [ 0.000000] Memory policy: Data cache writealloc
> [ 0.000000] efi: UEFI not found.
> [ 0.000000] cma: Size (0x04000000) of region at 0x00000000 exceeds
> limit (0x00000000)
> [ 0.000000] cma: Failed to reserve 64 MiB on node -1
Is this a highmem related thing. Passing -m 2G allows it to get further
and 4G is obviously at the limit of 32 bit?
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists