lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ca992144d644d2b88feb89c8fb5eabd@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 12:09:45 +0000
From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
CC: "dave.jiang@...el.com" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, "dan.j.williams@...el.com"
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "alison.schofield@...el.com"
	<alison.schofield@...el.com>, "vishal.l.verma@...el.com"
	<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "ira.weiny@...el.com" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
	"dave@...olabs.net" <dave@...olabs.net>, "linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, tanxiaofei
	<tanxiaofei@...wei.com>, "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
>Sent: 18 October 2024 12:04
>To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
>Cc: dave.jiang@...el.com; dan.j.williams@...el.com; alison.schofield@...el.com;
>vishal.l.verma@...el.com; ira.weiny@...el.com; dave@...olabs.net; linux-
>cxl@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
><linuxarm@...wei.com>; tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>; Zengtao (B)
><prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records
>
>On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:33:45 +0100
><shiju.jose@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
>>
>> CXL spec rev 3.1 CXL Event Records has updated w.r.t CXL spec rev 3.0.
>> Add updates for the above spec changes in the CXL events records and
>> CXL trace events implementation.
>>
>> Note: Please apply following fix patch first if not present.
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/cxl/patch/20241014143003.1170-1-s
>> hiju.jose@...wei.com/
>>
>> Shiju Jose (4):
>>   cxl/events: Updates for CXL Common Event Record Format
>>   cxl/events: Updates for CXL General Media Event Record
>>   cxl/events: Updates for CXL DRAM Event Record
>>   cxl/events: Updates for CXL Memory Module Event Record
>>
>>  drivers/cxl/core/trace.h | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  include/cxl/event.h      |  20 +++-
>>  2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>
>Hi Shiju,
>
>Why are these an RFC?  Seem in a good state to me and the questions I'm seeing
>are naming stuff that to me doesn't justify RFC status.
>
>Jonathan

Hi Jonathan,

I add RFC since it is v1.  I will exclude RFC in v2.  

Thanks,
Shiju

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ