[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241019012940.3656292-1-jthoughton@google.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 01:29:37 +0000
From: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
David Stevens <stevensd@...gle.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm: multi-gen LRU: Have secondary MMUs participate in MM_WALK
Today, the MM_WALK capability causes MGLRU to clear the young bit from
PMDs and PTEs during the page table walk before eviction, but MGLRU does
not call the clear_young() MMU notifier in this case. By not calling
this notifier, the MM walk takes less time/CPU, but it causes pages that
are accessed mostly through KVM / secondary MMUs to appear younger than
they should be.
We do call the clear_young() notifier today, but only when attempting to
evict the page, so we end up clearing young/accessed information less
frequently for secondary MMUs than for mm PTEs, and therefore they
appear younger and are less likely to be evicted. Therefore, memory that
is *not* being accessed mostly by KVM will be evicted *more* frequently,
worsening performance.
ChromeOS observed a tab-open latency regression when enabling MGLRU with
a setup that involved running a VM:
Tab-open latency histogram (ms)
Version p50 mean p95 p99 max
base 1315 1198 2347 3454 10319
mglru 2559 1311 7399 12060 43758
fix 1119 926 2470 4211 6947
This series replaces the final non-selftest patchs from this series[1],
which introduced a similar change (and a new MMU notifier) with KVM
optimizations. I'll send a separate series (to Sean and Paolo) for the
KVM optimizations.
This series also makes proactive reclaim with MGLRU possible for KVM
memory. I have verified that this functions correctly with the selftest
from [1], but given that that test is a KVM selftest, I'll send it with
the rest of the KVM optimizations later. Andrew, let me know if you'd
like to take the test now anyway.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240926013506.860253-18-jthoughton@google.com/
Yu Zhao (2):
mm: multi-gen LRU: remove MM_LEAF_OLD and MM_NONLEAF_TOTAL stats
mm: multi-gen LRU: use {ptep,pmdp}_clear_young_notify()
include/linux/mmzone.h | 7 ++-
mm/rmap.c | 9 ++--
mm/vmscan.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
base-commit: b5d43fad926a3f542cd06f3c9d286f6f489f7129
--
2.47.0.105.g07ac214952-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists