[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYAynE2k6LEYrmcvJcO1gJW+NH4wv-S7F_xa-SvsueDZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 20:21:51 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] pinctrl: pinmux: Introduce API to check if a pin is requested
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:39 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> @@ -100,6 +101,10 @@ static inline void pinmux_disable_setting(const struct pinctrl_setting *setting)
> {
> }
>
> +bool pin_requested(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif
You need "static inline" in front of the stub, that's why the robot is
complaining.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists