lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241019195534.79603-1-yesanishhere@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:55:33 -0700
From: anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com>
To: jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
	corbet@....net
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mailbox: Documentation: remove the old documentation

In preparation of better and latest documentation,
remove the current documentation.

Signed-off-by: anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com>
---
 Documentation/driver-api/mailbox.rst | 129 ---------------------------
 1 file changed, 129 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/mailbox.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/mailbox.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/mailbox.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 0ed95009cc30..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/mailbox.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
-============================
-The Common Mailbox Framework
-============================
-
-:Author: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
-
-This document aims to help developers write client and controller
-drivers for the API. But before we start, let us note that the
-client (especially) and controller drivers are likely going to be
-very platform specific because the remote firmware is likely to be
-proprietary and implement non-standard protocol. So even if two
-platforms employ, say, PL320 controller, the client drivers can't
-be shared across them. Even the PL320 driver might need to accommodate
-some platform specific quirks. So the API is meant mainly to avoid
-similar copies of code written for each platform. Having said that,
-nothing prevents the remote f/w to also be Linux based and use the
-same api there. However none of that helps us locally because we only
-ever deal at client's protocol level.
-
-Some of the choices made during implementation are the result of this
-peculiarity of this "common" framework.
-
-
-
-Controller Driver (See include/linux/mailbox_controller.h)
-==========================================================
-
-
-Allocate mbox_controller and the array of mbox_chan.
-Populate mbox_chan_ops, except peek_data() all are mandatory.
-The controller driver might know a message has been consumed
-by the remote by getting an IRQ or polling some hardware flag
-or it can never know (the client knows by way of the protocol).
-The method in order of preference is IRQ -> Poll -> None, which
-the controller driver should set via 'txdone_irq' or 'txdone_poll'
-or neither.
-
-
-Client Driver (See include/linux/mailbox_client.h)
-==================================================
-
-
-The client might want to operate in blocking mode (synchronously
-send a message through before returning) or non-blocking/async mode (submit
-a message and a callback function to the API and return immediately).
-
-::
-
-	struct demo_client {
-		struct mbox_client cl;
-		struct mbox_chan *mbox;
-		struct completion c;
-		bool async;
-		/* ... */
-	};
-
-	/*
-	* This is the handler for data received from remote. The behaviour is purely
-	* dependent upon the protocol. This is just an example.
-	*/
-	static void message_from_remote(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg)
-	{
-		struct demo_client *dc = container_of(cl, struct demo_client, cl);
-		if (dc->async) {
-			if (is_an_ack(mssg)) {
-				/* An ACK to our last sample sent */
-				return; /* Or do something else here */
-			} else { /* A new message from remote */
-				queue_req(mssg);
-			}
-		} else {
-			/* Remote f/w sends only ACK packets on this channel */
-			return;
-		}
-	}
-
-	static void sample_sent(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg, int r)
-	{
-		struct demo_client *dc = container_of(cl, struct demo_client, cl);
-		complete(&dc->c);
-	}
-
-	static void client_demo(struct platform_device *pdev)
-	{
-		struct demo_client *dc_sync, *dc_async;
-		/* The controller already knows async_pkt and sync_pkt */
-		struct async_pkt ap;
-		struct sync_pkt sp;
-
-		dc_sync = kzalloc(sizeof(*dc_sync), GFP_KERNEL);
-		dc_async = kzalloc(sizeof(*dc_async), GFP_KERNEL);
-
-		/* Populate non-blocking mode client */
-		dc_async->cl.dev = &pdev->dev;
-		dc_async->cl.rx_callback = message_from_remote;
-		dc_async->cl.tx_done = sample_sent;
-		dc_async->cl.tx_block = false;
-		dc_async->cl.tx_tout = 0; /* doesn't matter here */
-		dc_async->cl.knows_txdone = false; /* depending upon protocol */
-		dc_async->async = true;
-		init_completion(&dc_async->c);
-
-		/* Populate blocking mode client */
-		dc_sync->cl.dev = &pdev->dev;
-		dc_sync->cl.rx_callback = message_from_remote;
-		dc_sync->cl.tx_done = NULL; /* operate in blocking mode */
-		dc_sync->cl.tx_block = true;
-		dc_sync->cl.tx_tout = 500; /* by half a second */
-		dc_sync->cl.knows_txdone = false; /* depending upon protocol */
-		dc_sync->async = false;
-
-		/* ASync mailbox is listed second in 'mboxes' property */
-		dc_async->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&dc_async->cl, 1);
-		/* Populate data packet */
-		/* ap.xxx = 123; etc */
-		/* Send async message to remote */
-		mbox_send_message(dc_async->mbox, &ap);
-
-		/* Sync mailbox is listed first in 'mboxes' property */
-		dc_sync->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&dc_sync->cl, 0);
-		/* Populate data packet */
-		/* sp.abc = 123; etc */
-		/* Send message to remote in blocking mode */
-		mbox_send_message(dc_sync->mbox, &sp);
-		/* At this point 'sp' has been sent */
-
-		/* Now wait for async chan to be done */
-		wait_for_completion(&dc_async->c);
-	}
-- 
2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ