[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxQtlwVZ9JfIM8tl@tom-HP-ZBook-Fury-15-G7-Mobile-Workstation>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 00:07:19 +0200
From: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, prabhakar.csengg@...il.com,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
Paweł Anikiel <panikiel@...gle.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: v4l2-subdev: Refactor events
Hi Sakari,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 07:30:30PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> Thanks for working on this.
In real it's a Laurent's suggestion :)
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 07:11:03PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > Controls can be exposed to userspace via a v4l-subdevX device, and
> > userspace has to be able to subscribe to control events so that it is
> > notified when the control changes value.
> > If a control handler is set for the subdev then set the HAS_EVENTS
> > flag automatically into v4l2_subdev_init_finalize() and use
> > v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event() and v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe()
> > as default if subdev don't have .(un)subscribe control operations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> > index 3a4ba08810d2..77ca829b9983 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> > @@ -691,10 +691,25 @@ static long subdev_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, void *arg,
> > return v4l2_event_dequeue(vfh, arg, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> >
> > case VIDIOC_SUBSCRIBE_EVENT:
> > - return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, subscribe_event, vfh, arg);
> > + if (v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, core, subscribe_event))
> > + return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, subscribe_event,
> > + vfh, arg);
> > +
> > + if ((sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS) &&
> > + vfh->ctrl_handler)
> > + return v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event(sd, vfh, arg);
> > +
> > + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>
> While this mostly does the same thing, I prefer the order of tests below.
> Could you align event subscription with unsubscription?
What about:
case VIDIOC_SUBSCRIBE_EVENT:
if (!(sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS))
return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
if (v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, core, subscribe_event))
return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, subscribe_event,
vfh, arg);
if (!vfh->ctrl_handler)
return -ENOTTY;
return v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event(sd, vfh, arg);
case VIDIOC_UNSUBSCRIBE_EVENT:
if (!(sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS))
return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
if (v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, core, unsubscribe_event))
return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, unsubscribe_event,
vfh, arg);
return v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe(sd, vfh, arg);
?
Thanks & Regards,
Tommaso
>
> >
> > case VIDIOC_UNSUBSCRIBE_EVENT:
> > - return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, unsubscribe_event, vfh, arg);
> > + if (!(sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS))
> > + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> > +
> > + if (v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, core, unsubscribe_event))
> > + return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, unsubscribe_event,
> > + vfh, arg);
> > +
> > + return v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe(sd, vfh, arg);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG
> > case VIDIOC_DBG_G_REGISTER:
> > @@ -1641,6 +1656,9 @@ int __v4l2_subdev_init_finalize(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, const char *name,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (sd->ctrl_handler)
> > + sd->flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS;
> > +
> > state = __v4l2_subdev_state_alloc(sd, name, key);
> > if (IS_ERR(state))
> > return PTR_ERR(state);
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists