[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxaEk6SAuP2VeF2T@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:42:59 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
<dwmw2@...radead.org>, <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<eric.auger@...hat.com>, <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <mdf@...nel.org>,
<mshavit@...gle.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
<smostafa@...gle.com>, <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <aik@....com>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] iommufd/viommu: Introduce IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE
and its related struct
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:21:48AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 06:35:45PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 03:45:56PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > +struct iommufd_vdevice *
> > > > +__iommufd_vdevice_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, size_t size)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct iommufd_object *obj;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (WARN_ON(size < sizeof(struct iommufd_vdevice)))
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > > + obj = iommufd_object_alloc_elm(ictx, size, IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(obj))
> > > > + return ERR_CAST(obj);
> > > > + return container_of(obj, struct iommufd_vdevice, obj);
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Like for the viommu this can all just be folded into the #define
> >
> > It seems that we have to keep two small functions as followings,
> > unless we want to expose the enum iommufd_object_type.
>
> I'd probably expose the enum along with the struct..
OK. Let's do that.
Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists