[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f319c8bd-1edc-451b-aeb2-27ec529267a3@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:19:40 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...libre.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
michael.hennerich@...log.com, gstols@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] iio: adc: ad7606: use realbits for sign-extending in
scan_direct
On 10/21/24 8:02 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> Currently the 'ad7606' driver supports parts with 18 and 16 bits
> resolutions.
> But when adding support for AD7607 (which has a 14-bit resolution) we
> should check for the 'realbits' field, to be able to sign-extend correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c
> index d0fe9fd65f3f..a1f0c2feb04a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c
> @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static int ad7606_scan_direct(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int ch,
> int *val)
> {
> struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> - unsigned int storagebits = st->chip_info->channels[1].scan_type.storagebits;
> + unsigned int realbits = st->chip_info->channels[1].scan_type.realbits;
> const struct iio_chan_spec *chan;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -603,15 +603,29 @@ static int ad7606_scan_direct(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int ch,
>
> chan = &indio_dev->channels[ch + 1];
> if (chan->scan_type.sign == 'u') {
> - if (storagebits > 16)
I think it would be simpler to keep this if statement for choosing
which data.bufXX to use since there are only 2 choices.
> + switch (realbits) {
> + case 18:
> *val = st->data.buf32[ch];
> - else
> + break;
> + case 16:
> *val = st->data.buf16[ch];
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> } else {
> - if (storagebits > 16)
> + switch (realbits) {
> + case 18:
> *val = sign_extend32(st->data.buf32[ch], 17);
> - else
> + break;
> + case 16:
> *val = sign_extend32(st->data.buf16[ch], 15);
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
We can change this to:
*val = sign_extend32(st->data.buf16[ch], reablbits - 1);
Then no additional changes should be needed to support 14-bit chips.
And similarly, we could avoid the need to use the more verbose
switch statement.
> }
>
> error_ret:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists