[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zxas7TA5j8oKLa5x@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:35:09 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, masahiroy@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, ojeda@...nel.org, gary@...yguo.net,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Benjamin Gray <bgray@...ux.ibm.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
neal@...pa.dev, marcan@...can.st, j@...nau.net,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/16] modules: Support extended MODVERSIONS info
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 01:45:35PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:08:19PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Hi Luis,
> >
> > On 10/17/24 01:21, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > That sounds great. Yeah, the above would be great to test. A while ago
> > > I wrote a new modules selftests in order to test possible improvements
> > > on find_symbol() but I also did this due to push the limits of the
> > > numbers of symbols we could support. I wrote all this to also test the
> > > possible 64-bit alignment benefits of __ksymtab_ sections on
> > > architectures without CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS (e.g. ppc64,
> > > ppc64le, parisc, s390x,...). [....]
> > >
> > > I forget what we concluded on Helge Deller's alignement patches, I think
> > > there was an idea on how to address the alignment through other means.
> > >
> > > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git/log/?h=20241016-modules-symtab
> >
> > I stumbled upon the unaligned-memory-access.rst document [1].
> > Please read it, as it is a really good document, and the section
> > "Why unaligned access is bad" states:
> > It should be obvious from the above that if your code causes unaligned
> > memory accesses to happen, your code will not work correctly on certain
> > platforms and will cause performance problems on others.
> >
> > With this in mind, you really should apply both of my alignment
> > patches which you currently carry in [0].
> >
> > For parisc I partly solved the issue by fixing the arch-specific kernel unalignment
> > handler, but every time module sections are stored unaligned, it triggers
> > performance degregation on parisc (and other sensitive platforms).
> >
> > I suggest you apply them unconditionally.
> >
> > Helge
> >
> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst
>
> You're right, I've just referred to that doc and pushed to the new
> linux modules [2] modules-next branch. This is also great timing so
> that the work that is ongoing for Rust will take this into
> consideration as well. I'll just post the test I wrote as separate
> thing but it surely can be used to help test some of this later.
>
> [2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/modules/linux.git
Helge,
I went down memory lane and noted Masahiro asked for this to be done
in asm so I droped your patches. Feel free to post a new iteration.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists