| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkYOGA2oQ=BSP3oXeV0Fh2=QRZZ=_5t2Wg6qrYZixCkZAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:11:29 -0700
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
david@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org, kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com,
nphamcs@...il.com, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev, ryan.roberts@....com,
ying.huang@...el.com, 21cnbao@...il.com, riel@...riel.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, kernel-team@...a.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] mm/zswap: skip swapcache for swapping in zswap pages
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 3:50 AM Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com> wrote:
>
> As mentioned in [1], there is a significant improvement in no
> readahead swapin performance for super fast devices when skipping
> swapcache.
>
> With large folio zswapin support added in later patches, this will also
> mean this path will also act as "readahead" by swapping in multiple
> pages into large folios. further improving performance.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1505886205-9671-5-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org/T/#m5a792a04dfea20eb7af4c355d00503efe1c86a93
>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/zswap.h | 6 ++++++
> mm/memory.c | 3 ++-
> mm/page_io.c | 1 -
> mm/zswap.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/zswap.h b/include/linux/zswap.h
> index d961ead91bf1..e418d75db738 100644
> --- a/include/linux/zswap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/zswap.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct zswap_lruvec_state {
> unsigned long zswap_total_pages(void);
> bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio);
> bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio);
> +bool zswap_present_test(swp_entry_t swp, int nr_pages);
> void zswap_invalidate(swp_entry_t swp);
> int zswap_swapon(int type, unsigned long nr_pages);
> void zswap_swapoff(int type);
> @@ -49,6 +50,11 @@ static inline bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline bool zswap_present_test(swp_entry_t swp, int nr_pages)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static inline void zswap_invalidate(swp_entry_t swp) {}
> static inline int zswap_swapon(int type, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 03e5452dd0c0..49d243131169 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4289,7 +4289,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> swapcache = folio;
>
> if (!folio) {
> - if (data_race(si->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO) &&
> + if ((data_race(si->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO) ||
> + zswap_present_test(entry, 1)) &&
> __swap_count(entry) == 1) {
> /* skip swapcache */
> folio = alloc_swap_folio(vmf);
> diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
> index 4aa34862676f..2a15b197968a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_io.c
> +++ b/mm/page_io.c
> @@ -602,7 +602,6 @@ void swap_read_folio(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **plug)
> unsigned long pflags;
> bool in_thrashing;
>
> - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_swapcache(folio) && !synchronous, folio);
> VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_uptodate(folio), folio);
>
> diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> index 7f00cc918e7c..f4b03071b2fb 100644
> --- a/mm/zswap.c
> +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> @@ -1576,6 +1576,52 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static bool swp_offset_in_zswap(unsigned int type, pgoff_t offset)
> +{
> + return (offset >> SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT) < nr_zswap_trees[type];
> +}
> +
> +/* Returns true if the entire folio is in zswap */
> +bool zswap_present_test(swp_entry_t swp, int nr_pages)
Also, did you check how the performance changes if we bring back the
bitmap of present entries (i.e. what used to be frontswap's bitmap)
instead of the tree lookups here?
> +{
> + pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(swp), tree_max_idx;
> + int max_idx = 0, i = 0, tree_offset = 0;
> + unsigned int type = swp_type(swp);
> + struct zswap_entry *entry = NULL;
> + struct xarray *tree;
> +
> + while (i < nr_pages) {
> + tree_offset = offset + i;
> + /* Check if the tree exists. */
> + if (!swp_offset_in_zswap(type, tree_offset))
> + return false;
> +
> + tree = swap_zswap_tree(swp_entry(type, tree_offset));
> + XA_STATE(xas, tree, tree_offset);
> +
> + tree_max_idx = tree_offset % SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES ?
> + ALIGN(tree_offset, SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES) :
> + ALIGN(tree_offset + 1, SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES);
> + max_idx = min(offset + nr_pages, tree_max_idx) - 1;
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + xas_for_each(&xas, entry, max_idx) {
> + if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
> + continue;
> + i++;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + /*
> + * If xas_for_each exits because entry is NULL and
> + * the number of entries checked are less then max idx,
> + * then zswap does not contain the entire folio.
> + */
> + if (!entry && offset + i <= max_idx)
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio)
> {
> swp_entry_t swp = folio->swap;
> --
> 2.43.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists