[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <583282bc-17b7-4c7c-8e94-44d720c09682@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:12:27 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alessandro Zanni <alessandro.zanni87@...il.com>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anupnewsmail@...il.com,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/intel_pstate: fix operand expected
On 10/21/24 09:04, Alessandro Zanni wrote:
>> On 24/10/14 06:05, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 10/14/24 11:21, Alessandro Zanni wrote:
>>>> This fix solves theses errors, when calling kselftest with
>>>> targets "intel_pstate":
>>>>
>>>> ./run.sh: line 90: / 1000: syntax error: operand expected (error token is "/ 1000")
>>>>
>>>> ./run.sh: line 92: / 1000: syntax error: operand expected (error token is "/ 1000")
>>>>
>>>> To error was found by running tests manually with the command:
>>>> make kselftest TARGETS=intel_pstate
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zanni <alessandro.zanni87@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Notes:
>>>> v2: removed debug echos
>>>
>>> See my comments on your v1. It would help to wait a bit
>>> to send v2.
>>
>> Ok and thanks for the comments.
>>
>>> I can't reproduce this problem on Linux 6.12-rc3.
>>> What's you environment like?
>>
>> My kernel version is 6.12.0-rc3 from "make kernelversion".
>>
>> I think the errors are related to the bash type and version, rather than the kernel version.
>> My bash version is: GNU bash, version 5.2.21(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>>
>> In fact, some shell do not complete expressions in variables and $var and command substitutions
>> are done before the arithmetic expression itself is parsed.
>> That expansion happens without regard for the arithmetic syntax, so with $var you can mess
>> with that.
>> So, I suggest to avoid to use $var inside a arithmetic expansion in order to be cross-platform.
>
> Hello,
> any thoughts about this patch?
>
> Were you able to replicate the error?
>
Yes I was able to reproduce what you are seeing.
>>>>
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/run.sh | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/run.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/run.sh
>>>> index e7008f614ad7..0c1b6c1308a4 100755
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/run.sh
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/run.sh
>>>> @@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ mkt_freq=${_mkt_freq}0
>>>> # Get the ranges from cpupower
>>>> _min_freq=$(cpupower frequency-info -l | tail -1 | awk ' { print $1 } ')
>>>> -min_freq=$(($_min_freq / 1000))
>>>> +min_freq=$((_min_freq / 1000))
>>>> _max_freq=$(cpupower frequency-info -l | tail -1 | awk ' { print $2 } ')
>>>> -max_freq=$(($_max_freq / 1000))
>>>> +max_freq=$((_max_freq / 1000))
>>>> [ $EVALUATE_ONLY -eq 0 ] && for freq in `seq $max_freq -100 $min_freq`
>>>
The patch is fine. I applied and run it. I found another problem
when cpupower command doesn't run
# ./run.sh: line 89: cpupower: command not found
# ./run.sh: line 91: cpupower: command not found
So you would have to check if min_freq and max_freq are valid
and don't continue if cpupower isn't found. This test depends
on cpupower.
You can do that as a separate patch and send it as a series with
commit log changes I suggested on v1 of this patch.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists