lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172955007659.195060.15034869301013958050.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 23:34:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
 tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, markus.stockhausen@....de, 
 Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v5 0/3] Realtek SPI-NAND controller

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:54:31 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> This series adds support for the SPI-NAND flash controller on the RTL9300
> family of SoCs.
> 
> There are 2 physical chip selects which are called SPI_MST_CS0 and SPI_MST_CS1
> in the datasheet. Via some pin-strapping these can be assigned to either the
> SPI-NOR controller or the SPI-NAND controller. Which means you can end up with
> the following permutations
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] dt-bindings: spi: Add realtek,rtl9301-snand
      commit: eef26f1c6179eee5b622362b324a0a72dafb5c16
[3/3] spi: spi-mem: Add Realtek SPI-NAND controller
      commit: 42d20a6a61b8fccbb57d80df1ccde7dd82d5bbd6

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ