[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <003f01db237f$3e707de0$bb5179a0$@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:05:35 +0900
From: κΉνμ <trunixs.kim@...sung.com>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk@...nel.org>, "'Wim Van Sebroeck'"
<wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, "'Guenter Roeck'" <linux@...ck-us.net>, "'Rob
Herring'" <robh@...nel.org>, "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"'Conor Dooley'" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "'Alim Akhtar'"
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, "'Byoungtae Cho'" <bt.cho@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: Document ExynosAutoV920
watchdog bindings
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 8:47 PM
> To: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@...sung.com>; Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-
> watchdog.org>; Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>; Rob Herring
> <robh@...nel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>; Conor Dooley
> <conor+dt@...nel.org>; Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org; Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@...sung.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: Document ExynosAutoV920
> watchdog bindings
>
> On 10/10/2024 13:18, Taewan Kim wrote:
> > From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@...sung.com>
> >
> > Add "samsung-exynosautov920-wdt" compatible to the dt-schema document.
> > ExynosAutoV920 is new SoC for automotive, similar to
> > exynosautov9 but some CPU configurations are quite different.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@...sung.com>
>
> Shall we do the work twice?
I missed it by mistake, I'm sorry.
I will push v3 with tags.
>
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions,
> under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided in
> a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here.
> However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The
> upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they
> apply.
>
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=19c96b19-46525206-19c8e056-
> 000babdfecba-8f51e01dd01bb666&q=1&e=eb401f36-1904-4376-adea-
> 9688adb1d657&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.5-
> rc3%2Fsource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-patches.rst%23L577
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists