[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxX_eL_hs-_eKW0h@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:15:04 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: sparcspkr - use cleanup facility for
device_node
Hi Javier,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 08:27:13PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> Use the 'free(device_node)' macro to simplify the code by automatically
> freeing the device node, which removes the need for explicit calls to
> 'of_node_put()'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - rebase onto input/next, drop applied patches.
> - sparcspkr: drop goto before node declaration and return -ENOMEM.
Can we switch the driver to devm so that issues with cleanup and gotos
will have less chances of resurfacing?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists