[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8vq4K1R_uPW5yf5gX85pO=LNU6_GT4xSLSWZaVqAMewFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:03:14 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] pinctrl: pinmux: Introduce API to check if a pin is requested
Hi Linus,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 7:22 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:39 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > @@ -100,6 +101,10 @@ static inline void pinmux_disable_setting(const struct pinctrl_setting *setting)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > +bool pin_requested(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > #endif
>
> You need "static inline" in front of the stub, that's why the robot is
> complaining.
>
Agreed, If there are no other comments for the rest of the patches
I'll just send an updated patch for this or include it as part of the
whole series.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists