linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 34/57] sata_sil24: Remove PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZxY-Y6GF0m_wTfyD@ryzen.lan>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:43:31 +0200
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Greg Marsden <greg.marsden@...cle.com>,
	Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@...e.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 34/57] sata_sil24: Remove PAGE_SIZE compile-time
 constant assumption

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:26:15PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 21/10/2024 12:04, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:24:37AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> >> On 17/10/2024 13:51, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 01:42:22PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> > 
> > (snip)
> > 
> >> That said, while investigating this, I've spotted a bug in my change. paddr calculation in sil24_qc_issue() is incorrect since sizeof(*pp->cmd_block) is no longer PAGE_SIZE. Based on feedback in another patch, I'm also converting the BUG_ONs to WARN_ON_ONCEs.
> > 
> > Side note: Please wrap you lines to 80 characters max.
> 
> Yes sorry, I turned off line wrapping for that last mail because I didn't want
> it to wrap the copy/pasted patch. I'll figure out how to mix and match for future.
> 
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >> Additional proposed change, which I'll plan to include in the next version:
> >>
> >> ---8<---
> >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
> >> index 85c6382976626..c402bf998c4ee 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
> >> @@ -257,6 +257,10 @@ union sil24_cmd_block {
> >>         struct sil24_atapi_block atapi;
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> +#define SIL24_ATA_BLOCK_SIZE   struct_size_t(struct sil24_ata_block, sge, SIL24_MAX_SGE)
> >> +#define SIL24_ATAPI_BLOCK_SIZE struct_size_t(struct sil24_atapi_block, sge, SIL24_MAX_SGE)
> >> +#define SIL24_CMD_BLOCK_SIZE   max(SIL24_ATA_BLOCK_SIZE, SIL24_ATAPI_BLOCK_SIZE)
> >> +
> >>  static const struct sil24_cerr_info {
> >>         unsigned int err_mask, action;
> >>         const char *desc;
> >> @@ -886,7 +890,7 @@ static unsigned int sil24_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> >>         dma_addr_t paddr;
> >>         void __iomem *activate;
> >>  
> >> -       paddr = pp->cmd_block_dma + tag * sizeof(*pp->cmd_block);
> >> +       paddr = pp->cmd_block_dma + tag * SIL24_CMD_BLOCK_SIZE;
> >>         activate = port + PORT_CMD_ACTIVATE + tag * 8;
> >>  
> >>         /*
> >> @@ -1192,7 +1196,7 @@ static int sil24_port_start(struct ata_port *ap)
> >>         struct device *dev = ap->host->dev;
> >>         struct sil24_port_priv *pp;
> >>         union sil24_cmd_block *cb;
> >> -       size_t cb_size = PAGE_SIZE * SIL24_MAX_CMDS;
> >> +       size_t cb_size = SIL24_CMD_BLOCK_SIZE * SIL24_MAX_CMDS;
> >>         dma_addr_t cb_dma;
> >>  
> >>         pp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pp), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> @@ -1265,8 +1269,8 @@ static int sil24_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> >>         u32 tmp;
> >>  
> >>         /* union sil24_cmd_block must be PAGE_SIZE */
> > 
> > This comment should probably be rephrased to be more clear then, since like
> > you said sizeof(union sil24_cmd_block) will no longer be PAGE_SIZE.
> 
> How about:
> 
> /*
>  * union sil24_cmd_block must be PAGE_SIZE once taking into account the 'sge'
>  * flexible array members in struct sil24_atapi_block and struct sil24_ata_block
>  */

Sounds good to me!


Kind regards,
Niklas