| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c95252f7-12a7-49b8-8bf6-2ff3ada845ff@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:22:14 +0800
From: Yongbang Shi <shiyongbang@...wei.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <xinliang.liu@...aro.org>, <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>,
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>, <liangjian010@...wei.com>,
<chenjianmin@...wei.com>, <lidongming5@...wei.com>, <libaihan@...wei.com>,
<shenjian15@...wei.com>, <shaojijie@...wei.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<shiyongbang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-dp 3/4] drm/hisilicon/hibmc: add dp kapi moduel in
hibmc drivers
Hi Dmitry,
There're some format problems with the previous replies. Send it again here.
Thanks for your advices, I'll resolve the problems you mentioned.
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 06:06:09PM +0800, shiyongbang wrote:
>> From: baihan li <libaihan@...wei.com>
>>
>> Build a kapi level that hibmc driver can enable dp by
>> calling these kapi functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: baihan li <libaihan@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile | 2 +-
>> .../gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_config.h | 20 ++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.c | 12 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_config.h
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
>> index 94d77da88bbf..693036dfab52 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> hibmc-drm-y := hibmc_drm_drv.o hibmc_drm_de.o hibmc_drm_vdac.o hibmc_drm_i2c.o \
>> - dp/dp_aux.o dp/dp_link.o
>> + dp/dp_aux.o dp/dp_link.o dp/dp_kapi.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_HISI_HIBMC) += hibmc-drm.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_config.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_config.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..a6353a808cc4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_config.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Hisilicon Limited. */
>> +
>> +#ifndef DP_CONFIG_H
>> +#define DP_CONFIG_H
>> +
>> +#define DP_BPP 24
>> +#define DP_SYMBOL_PER_FCLK 4
>> +#define DP_MIN_PULSE_NUM 0x9
>> +#define DP_MSA1 0x20
>> +#define DP_MSA2 0x845c00
>> +#define DP_OFFSET 0x1e0000
>> +#define DP_HDCP 0x2
>> +#define DP_INT_RST 0xffff
>> +#define DP_DPTX_RST 0x3ff
>> +#define DP_CLK_EN 0x7
>> +#define DP_SYNC_EN_MASK 0x3
>> +#define DP_LINK_RATE_CAL 27
> I think some of these defines were used in previous patches. Please make
> sure that at each step the code builds without errors.
>
>> +
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.c
>> index 4091723473ad..ca7edc69427c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.c
>> @@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ static void hibmc_dp_set_tu(struct hibmc_dp_dev *dp, struct dp_mode *mode)
>> rate_ks = dp->link.cap.link_rate * DP_LINK_RATE_CAL;
>> value = (pixel_clock * bpp * 5000) / (61 * lane_num * rate_ks);
>>
>> - if (value % 10 == 9) { /* 10: div, 9: carry */
>> - tu_symbol_size = value / 10 + 1; /* 10: div */
>> + if (value % 10 == 9) { /* 9 carry */
>> + tu_symbol_size = value / 10 + 1;
>> tu_symbol_frac_size = 0;
>> } else {
>> - tu_symbol_size = value / 10; /* 10: div */
>> - tu_symbol_frac_size = value % 10 + 1; /* 10: div */
>> + tu_symbol_size = value / 10;
>> + tu_symbol_frac_size = value % 10 + 1;
>> }
>>
>> drm_info(dp->dev, "tu value: %u.%u value: %u\n",
>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void hibmc_dp_link_cfg(struct hibmc_dp_dev *dp, struct dp_mode *mode)
>> dp_write_bits(dp->base + DP_VIDEO_CTRL,
>> DP_CFG_STREAM_HSYNC_POLARITY, mode->h_pol);
>>
>> - /* MSA mic 0 and 1*/
>> + /* MSA mic 0 and 1 */
>> writel(DP_MSA1, dp->base + DP_VIDEO_MSA1);
>> writel(DP_MSA2, dp->base + DP_VIDEO_MSA2);
>>
>> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void hibmc_dp_link_cfg(struct hibmc_dp_dev *dp, struct dp_mode *mode)
>> dp_write_bits(dp->base + DP_VIDEO_CTRL, DP_CFG_STREAM_RGB_ENABLE, 0x1);
>> dp_write_bits(dp->base + DP_VIDEO_CTRL, DP_CFG_STREAM_VIDEO_MAPPING, 0);
>>
>> - /*divide 2: up even */
>> + /* divide 2: up even */
>> if (timing_delay % 2)
>> timing_delay++;
>>
> This should be squashed into the previous commits.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6b07642d55b8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_kapi.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Hisilicon Limited. */
>> +
>> +#ifndef DP_KAPI_H
>> +#define DP_KAPI_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_encoder.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_connector.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> Sort the headers, please.
>
>> +
>> +struct hibmc_dp_dev;
>> +
>> +struct dp_mode {
>> + u32 h_total;
>> + u32 h_active;
>> + u32 h_blank;
>> + u32 h_front;
>> + u32 h_sync;
>> + u32 h_back;
>> + bool h_pol;
>> + u32 v_total;
>> + u32 v_active;
>> + u32 v_blank;
>> + u32 v_front;
>> + u32 v_sync;
>> + u32 v_back;
>> + bool v_pol;
>> + u32 field_rate;
>> + u32 pixel_clock; // khz
> Why do you need a separate struct for this?
I can try to use drm_mode function and refactor this struct, but they're insufficient for our scenarios.
Here's change template bellow:
struct dp_mode {
sturct videomode mode;
u32 h_total;
u32 h_blank;
u32 v_total;
u32 v_blank;
u32 field_rate;
};
static void dp_mode_cfg(struct dp_mode *dp_mode, struct drm_display_mode *mode)
{
dp_mode->field_rate = drm_mode_vrefresh(mode);
drm_display_mode_to_videomode(mode, &dp_mode->vmode);
dp_mode->h_total = mode->htotal;
dp_mode->h_blank = mode->htotal - mode->hdisplay;
dp_mode->v_total = mode->vtotal;
dp_mode->v_blank = mode->vtotal - mode->vdisplay;
}
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct hibmc_dp {
>> + struct hibmc_dp_dev *dp_dev;
>> + struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>> + struct drm_encoder encoder;
>> + struct drm_connector connector;
>> + void __iomem *mmio;
>> +};
>> +
>> +int hibmc_dp_kapi_init(struct hibmc_dp *dp);
>> +void hibmc_dp_kapi_uninit(struct hibmc_dp *dp);
>> +int hibmc_dp_mode_set(struct hibmc_dp *dp, struct dp_mode *mode);
>> +void hibmc_dp_display_en(struct hibmc_dp *dp, bool enable);
> It looks like this should also be defined earlier.
>
>> +
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists