[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <427feed3-f51b-40d1-8609-4534a2815fc1@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:30:20 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>,
Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@...iatek.com>, Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: platform: mtk-mdp3: cmdq: Remove duplicated
platforms checks
Il 17/10/24 22:16, Mohammed Anees ha scritto:
> The platform compatibility checks for MT8183 and
> MT8195 in mdp_cmdq_prepare() are redundant as they are
> done in __get_config_offset() itself. Furthermore
> there are two if-else branch in __get_config_offset()
> which have similar conditions and are redundant.
> To address this, remove the check in mdp_cmdq_prepare()
> and combine the two if-else branch into one in
> __get_config_offset().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>
This should've been [PATCH v2], because this *is* a version 2: even if you
have changed the title a bit, it's still "the same" patch ;-)
Next time, please version your patches correctly.
Anyway, apart from this not being declared as v2, this time I'll let you
get my
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
...because the patch is good, and because it's only the first time that I warn
you about this :-)
Keep up the good work!
Cheers,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists