[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxZU5ViCYadY6eOE@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:19:33 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V5 07/26] posix-timers: Add proper state tracking
Le Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Right now the state tracking is done by two struct members:
>
> - it_active:
> A boolean which tracks armed/disarmed state
>
> - it_signal_seq:
> A sequence counter which is used to invalidate settings
> and prevent rearming
>
> Replace it_active with it_status and keep properly track about the states
> in one place.
>
> This allows to reuse it_signal_seq to track reprogramming, disarm and
Did you mean it_status here?
> delete operations in order to drop signals which are related to the state
> previous of those operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists