linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] selftests: livepatch: test livepatching a kprobed function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZxfEQ7WWfcSYfF1y@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:26:59 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Michael Vetter <mvetter@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] selftests: livepatch: test livepatching a kprobed
 function

On Thu 2024-10-17 22:01:29, Michael Vetter wrote:
> Thanks for all the reviews.
> 
> V5:
> Replace /sys/kernel/livepatch also in other/already existing tests.
> Improve commit message of 3rd patch.

JFYI, I have committed the patchset into livepatching.git,
branch for-6.13/selftests-kprobe.

I have fixed the wrong substitution in the 1st patch as suggested by Joe.

Also I have made two substitutions in test-syscall.sh in the 2nd patch
as suggested by Miroslav.

I would personally prefer to do the substitutions of existing paths
in a separate patch (same as Miroslav). But I do not think that
it was worth another respin. It would just increase risk of more
typos. And we have already spent enough time on this ;-)

Best Regards,
Petr