[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241022160933.GB402847@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:09:33 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Johnny Park <pjohnny0508@...il.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net-next] igb: Fix spelling "intialize"->"initialize"
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 11:11:56PM -0600, Johnny Park wrote:
> Simple patch that fixes the spelling mistake "intialize" in igb_main.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Johnny Park <pjohnny0508@...il.com>
Thanks Johnny,
I agree this is correct. But I am wondering if you could also fix the
following around 3909. It seems to be the only other non false-positive
flagged by codespell in this file.
mor -> more
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
Powered by blists - more mailing lists