lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxfmYIzQIIAs_awT@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:52:32 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add a test for open coded
 kmem_cache iter

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:36:49PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:06 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The new subtest is attached to sleepable fentry of syncfs() syscall.
> > It iterates the kmem_cache using bpf_for_each loop and count the number
> > of entries.  Finally it checks it with the number of entries from the
> > regular iterator.
> >
> >   $ ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t kmem_cache_iter
> >   ...
> >   #130/1   kmem_cache_iter/check_task_struct:OK
> >   #130/2   kmem_cache_iter/check_slabinfo:OK
> >   #130/3   kmem_cache_iter/open_coded_iter:OK
> >   #130     kmem_cache_iter:OK
> >   Summary: 1/3 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> >
> > Also simplify the code by using attach routine of the skeleton.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h  |  6 ++++
> >  .../bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c          | 28 +++++++++++--------
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c     | 24 ++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> > index b0668f29f7b394eb..cd8ecd39c3f3c68d 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> > @@ -582,4 +582,10 @@ extern int bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(struct bpf_wq *wq,
> >                 unsigned int flags__k, void *aux__ign) __ksym;
> >  #define bpf_wq_set_callback(timer, cb, flags) \
> >         bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(timer, cb, flags, NULL)
> > +
> > +struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache;
> > +extern int bpf_iter_kmem_cache_new(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym;
> > +extern struct kmem_cache *bpf_iter_kmem_cache_next(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym;
> > +extern void bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym;
> > +
> 
> we should be getting this from vmlinux.h nowadays, so this is probably
> unnecessary

That'd be nice.  Will remove.

> 
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c
> > index 848d8fc9171fae45..a1fd3bc57c0b21bb 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c
> > @@ -68,12 +68,18 @@ static void subtest_kmem_cache_iter_check_slabinfo(struct kmem_cache_iter *skel)
> >         fclose(fp);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void subtest_kmem_cache_iter_open_coded(struct kmem_cache_iter *skel)
> > +{
> > +       /* To trigger the open coded iterator attached to the syscall */
> > +       syncfs(0);
> 
> what Martin said, you still need to filter by PID

Yep.

>
> > +
> > +       /* It should be same as we've seen from the explicit iterator */
> > +       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->open_coded_seen, skel->bss->kmem_cache_seen, "open_code_seen_eq");
> > +}
> > +
> >  void test_kmem_cache_iter(void)
> >  {
> > -       DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
> >         struct kmem_cache_iter *skel = NULL;
> > -       union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {};
> > -       struct bpf_link *link;
> >         char buf[256];
> >         int iter_fd;
> >
> > @@ -81,16 +87,12 @@ void test_kmem_cache_iter(void)
> >         if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kmem_cache_iter__open_and_load"))
> >                 return;
> >
> > -       opts.link_info = &linfo;
> > -       opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
> > -
> > -       link = bpf_program__attach_iter(skel->progs.slab_info_collector, &opts);
> > -       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_iter"))
> > +       if (!ASSERT_OK(kmem_cache_iter__attach(skel), "skel_attach"))
> >                 goto destroy;
> >
> > -       iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
> > +       iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(skel->links.slab_info_collector));
> >         if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "iter_create"))
> > -               goto free_link;
> > +               goto detach;
> >
> >         memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> >         while (read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) > 0)) {
> > @@ -105,11 +107,13 @@ void test_kmem_cache_iter(void)
> >                 subtest_kmem_cache_iter_check_task_struct(skel);
> >         if (test__start_subtest("check_slabinfo"))
> >                 subtest_kmem_cache_iter_check_slabinfo(skel);
> > +       if (test__start_subtest("open_coded_iter"))
> > +               subtest_kmem_cache_iter_open_coded(skel);
> >
> >         close(iter_fd);
> >
> > -free_link:
> > -       bpf_link__destroy(link);
> > +detach:
> > +       kmem_cache_iter__detach(skel);
> >  destroy:
> >         kmem_cache_iter__destroy(skel);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c
> > index 72c9dafecd98406b..4c44aa279a5328fe 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
> >  /* Copyright (c) 2024 Google */
> >
> >  #include "bpf_iter.h"
> > +#include "bpf_experimental.h"
> > +#include "bpf_misc.h"
> >  #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> >  #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> >
> > @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *bpf_get_kmem_cache(u64 addr) __ksym;
> >  /* Result, will be checked by userspace */
> >  int task_struct_found;
> >  int kmem_cache_seen;
> > +int open_coded_seen;
> >
> >  SEC("iter/kmem_cache")
> >  int slab_info_collector(struct bpf_iter__kmem_cache *ctx)
> > @@ -85,3 +88,24 @@ int BPF_PROG(check_task_struct)
> >                 task_struct_found = -2;
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > +
> > +SEC("fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_syncfs")
> > +int open_coded_iter(const void *ctx)
> > +{
> > +       struct kmem_cache *s;
> > +
> > +       bpf_for_each(kmem_cache, s) {
> > +               struct kmem_cache_result *r;
> > +               int idx = open_coded_seen;
> > +
> > +               r = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&slab_result, &idx);
> 
> nit: you don't need idx, just `&open_coded_seen` should be fine, I think

Ok.

> 
> > +               if (r == NULL)
> 
> nit: !r

Will change!

Thanks,
Namhyung

> 
> > +                       break;
> > +
> > +               open_coded_seen++;
> > +
> > +               if (r->obj_size != s->size)
> > +                       break;
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ