[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241022180537.42492-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:05:37 -0700
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@...weicloud.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
foersleo@...zon.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
sieberf@...zon.com,
yeweihua4@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon/vaddr: Fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region()
Hi Zheng,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:39:25 +0800 Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@...weicloud.com> wrote:
[...]
> To fix it, count for each piece split and make sure no more than
> 'nr_pieces'. In addition, add above case into damon_test_split_evenly().
>
> And add 'nr_piece == 1' check in damon_va_evenly_split_region()
> for better code readability and add a corresponding kunit testcase.
>
> Zheng Yejian (2):
> mm/damon/vaddr: Fix issue in damon_va_evenly_split_region()
> mm/damon/vaddr: Check 'nr_piece == 1' case in
> damon_va_evenly_split_region()
>
> mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h | 2 ++
> mm/damon/vaddr.c | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thank you for addressing my comments and posting this new patch series. I
added my Reviewed-by: tags with some trivial comments to the patches.
Btw, at least on DAMON mailing list, we usually post new revisions as new
threads, rather than as a reply to the previous revision. If you want to make
sure involved people aware of the new series, you can send the lore link for
the new series as a reply to the previous revision.
Thanks,
SJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists