lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241022.Oov8ohRe4shu@digikod.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:50:03 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@...fet.re>
Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@...gle.com>, 
	Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>, Ivanov Mikhail <ivanov.mikhail1@...wei-partners.com>, 
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] samples/landlock: Clarify option parsing behaviour

On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Matthieu Buffet wrote:
> Clarify the distinction between filesystem variables (mandatory)
> and all others (optional).
> For optional variables, explain the difference between unset variables
> (no access check performed) and empty variables (nothing allowed for
> lists of allowed paths/ports, or no effect for lists of scopes).
> List LL_SCOPED values understood and their effect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@...fet.re>
> ---
>  samples/landlock/sandboxer.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/samples/landlock/sandboxer.c b/samples/landlock/sandboxer.c
> index 38fc6ebd7222..96b451cf0531 100644
> --- a/samples/landlock/sandboxer.c
> +++ b/samples/landlock/sandboxer.c
> @@ -296,23 +296,24 @@ static bool check_ruleset_scope(const char *const env_var,
>  /* clang-format off */
>  
>  static const char help[] =
> -	"usage: "
> -	ENV_FS_RO_NAME "=\"...\" "
> -	ENV_FS_RW_NAME "=\"...\" "
> -	ENV_TCP_BIND_NAME "=\"...\" "
> -	ENV_TCP_CONNECT_NAME "=\"...\" "
> -	ENV_SCOPED_NAME "=\"...\" %1$s <cmd> [args]...\n"
> +	"usage: " ENV_FS_RO_NAME "=\"...\" " ENV_FS_RW_NAME "=\"...\" "
> +	"[other environment variables] %1$s <cmd> [args]...\n"
>  	"\n"
> -	"Execute a command in a restricted environment.\n"
> +	"Execute the given command in a restricted environment.\n"
> +	"Multi-valued settings (lists of ports, paths, scopes) are colon-delimited.\n"
>  	"\n"
> -	"Environment variables containing paths and ports each separated by a colon:\n"
> -	"* " ENV_FS_RO_NAME ": list of paths allowed to be used in a read-only way\n"
> -	"* " ENV_FS_RW_NAME ": list of paths allowed to be used in a read-write way\n"
> +	"Mandatory settings:\n"
> +	"* " ENV_FS_RO_NAME ": paths allowed to be used in a read-only way\n"
> +	"* " ENV_FS_RW_NAME ": paths allowed to be used in a read-write way\n"
>  	"\n"
> -	"Environment variables containing ports are optional and could be skipped.\n"
> -	"* " ENV_TCP_BIND_NAME ": list of ports allowed to bind (server)\n"
> -	"* " ENV_TCP_CONNECT_NAME ": list of ports allowed to connect (client)\n"
> -	"* " ENV_SCOPED_NAME ": list of scoped IPCs\n"
> +	"Optional settings (when not set, their associated access check "
> +	"is always allowed, which is different from an empty string which "
> +	"means an empty list)\n"

I would just add ":" at the end of the line.  No need to send another
patch for that.

> +	"* " ENV_TCP_BIND_NAME ": ports allowed to bind (server)\n"
> +	"* " ENV_TCP_CONNECT_NAME ": ports allowed to connect (client)\n"
> +	"* " ENV_SCOPED_NAME ": actions denied on the outside of the landlock domain\n"
> +	"  - \"a\" to restrict opening abstract unix sockets\n"
> +	"  - \"s\" to restrict sending signals\n"
>  	"\n"
>  	"Example:\n"
>  	ENV_FS_RO_NAME "=\"${PATH}:/lib:/usr:/proc:/etc:/dev/urandom\" "
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ