[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241022032214.3915232-3-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:22:12 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <zhangkun09@...wei.com>, <fanghaiqing@...wei.com>,
<liuyonglong@...wei.com>, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, Alexander
Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] page_pool: fix timing for checking and disabling napi_local
page_pool page may be freed from skb_defer_free_flush() in
softirq context without binding to any specific napi, it
may cause use-after-free problem due to the below time window,
as below, CPU1 may still access napi->list_owner after CPU0
free the napi memory:
CPU 0 CPU1
page_pool_destroy() skb_defer_free_flush()
. .
. napi = READ_ONCE(pool->p.napi);
. .
page_pool_disable_direct_recycling() .
driver free napi memory .
. .
. napi && READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == cpuid
. .
Use rcu mechanism to avoid the above problem.
Note, the above was found during code reviewing on how to fix
the problem in [1].
1. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8067f204-1380-4d37-8ffd-007fc6f26738@kernel.org/T/
Fixes: dd64b232deb8 ("page_pool: unlink from napi during destroy")
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
CC: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
---
As the IOMMU fix patch depends on synchronize_rcu() added in this
patch and the time window is so small that it doesn't seem to be
an urgent fix, so target the net-next as the IOMMU fix patch does.
---
net/core/page_pool.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index a813d30d2135..dd497f5c927d 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -795,6 +795,7 @@ __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, netmem_ref netmem,
static bool page_pool_napi_local(const struct page_pool *pool)
{
const struct napi_struct *napi;
+ bool napi_local;
u32 cpuid;
if (unlikely(!in_softirq()))
@@ -810,9 +811,15 @@ static bool page_pool_napi_local(const struct page_pool *pool)
if (READ_ONCE(pool->cpuid) == cpuid)
return true;
+ /* Synchronizated with page_pool_destory() to avoid use-after-free
+ * for 'napi'.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
napi = READ_ONCE(pool->p.napi);
+ napi_local = napi && READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == cpuid;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- return napi && READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == cpuid;
+ return napi_local;
}
void page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem(struct page_pool *pool, netmem_ref netmem,
@@ -1126,6 +1133,12 @@ void page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool)
if (!page_pool_release(pool))
return;
+ /* Paired with rcu lock in page_pool_napi_local() to enable clearing
+ * of pool->p.napi in page_pool_disable_direct_recycling() is seen
+ * before returning to driver to free the napi instance.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
page_pool_detached(pool);
pool->defer_start = jiffies;
pool->defer_warn = jiffies + DEFER_WARN_INTERVAL;
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists