[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241022124501.5a6875f4d1725e2864cdcc48@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:45:01 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Remove redundant spinlock in
uprobe_deny_signal
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:22:22 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:12:32 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 07/31, Liao Chang wrote:
> > >
> > > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > > @@ -1979,9 +1979,7 @@ bool uprobe_deny_signal(void)
> > > WARN_ON_ONCE(utask->state != UTASK_SSTEP);
> > >
> > > if (task_sigpending(t)) {
> > > - spin_lock_irq(&t->sighand->siglock);
> > > clear_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
> > > - spin_unlock_irq(&t->sighand->siglock);
> >
> > Agreed, in this case ->siglock buys nothing, another signal can come
> > right after spin_unlock().
> >
> > Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> >
> >
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>
> Peter, can you pick this?
Oops, there is v3.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240815014629.2685155-2-liaochang1@huawei.com/
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists