[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zxcz7RiUxhETNYNM@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:41:09 +0530
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] amd-pstate: Make amd-pstate the default driver on
server platforms
Hello Mario,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 08:05:17AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 10/21/2024 05:18, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patchset contains two patches to
> >
> > * Prevent frequency throttling on power-limited systems with
> > amd-pstate active mode with performance governor.
> >
> > * Make amd_pstate default on EPYC Family 1A+. Based on tests, the
> > amd-pstate driver performs well enough on EPYC.
> >
> > These patches are based on the "linux-next" branch of
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git
> >
> > Gautham R. Shenoy (1):
> > amd-pstate: Set min_perf to nominal_perf for active mode performance
> > gov
> >
> > Swapnil Sapkal (1):
> > amd-pstate: Switch to amd-pstate by default on some Server platforms
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>
Thank you!
> I'll queue this up for 6.13.
>
> There were previously two differences for server and non-server:
> * amd-pstate not enabled by default
> * amd-pstate cpufreq policy starting in performance mode vs power-save?
>
> This series adjusts the first for at least the newer parts, but I would like
> to ask does it make sense to also evaluating changing the default policy to
> powersave as a follow up, or should this policy delta remain?
We would like to retain the policy delta for now and retain
CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE as the default on servers.
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists