linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v4 0/2] Add support for time DT property in TCPM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024102250-citric-dropout-17c7@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:14:26 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@...gle.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, badhri@...gle.com, kyletso@...gle.com,
	rdbabiera@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 0/2] Add support for time DT property in TCPM

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Amit Sunil Dhamne wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I had a process related question. Once an RFC patchset gets a Reviewed-by
> tag, do I need to send a formal [PATCH] or is an RFC patch sufficient for
> being accepted?

You need to send a real series (and please do not top-post), for it to
be considered for being accepted.

thanks,

greg k-h