[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241022073225.GO402847@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:25 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, vedang.patel@...el.com,
jithu.joseph@...el.com, andre.guedes@...el.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, sven.auhagen@...eatech.de,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether
drivers
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:56:19PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
> Fixing sparse error in xdp run code by introducing new variable xdp_res
> instead of overloading this into the skb pointer as i40e drivers done
> in commit 12738ac4754e ("i40e: Fix sparse errors in i40e_txrx.c") and
> commit ae4393dfd472 ("i40e: fix broken XDP support").
>
> v3: Fix uninitialized 'xdp_res' in patch 3 and 4 which Reported-by
> kernel test robot
> v2: Fix this as i40e drivers done instead of return NULL in xdp run code
Hi Yue Haibing, all,
I like these changes a lot. But I do wonder if it would
be more appropriate to target them at net-next (or iwl-next)
rather than net, without Fixes tags. This is because they
don't seem to be fixing (user-visible) bugs. Am I missing something?
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists